At the surface level, it might seem obvious that there is no comparison between the Datameer and Airflow. The two offerings focus on different problems and have very different approaches to solving their respective problems.
Airflow is a highly programmatic approach to workflows, including data orchestration workflows. Users require heavy Python experience and strong knowledge of the underlying service APIs which the tasks use.
Yet, some organizations use Airflow to orchestrate data pipelines which will include data transformation, or specifically use Airflow for data transformation. The data transformation tasks will either (a) transform the data directly in Python, or (b) load data into database schemas, transform the data using SQL statements in Python, then reload the data into new schemas – both highly programmatic.
If data architects are coordinating complex dataflows across multiple systems that have transactional properties, Airflow is a good tool and platform. In this use case, data architects will require the precision and control that Airflow offers. Data architects will also have strong Python skills and an understanding of the underlying APIs they use.
For data pipelines and data transformation, Airflow’s complexity and sophistication make it overkill for the use case. Modern ELT data pipelines can easily be defined and managed using a combination of no-code EL tools such as Fivetran and no-code/low-code data transformation tools such as Datameer – without writing ANY code. This allows your broader community of non-programmers in your analytics community to get involved in the analytics engineering process and expand the speed and adoption of your analytics.